The Boys of Sprawl
Governing Magazine
May 2000

The Oxymoron of Managed Growth
Business Leader Magazine
February 1998

Urban Growth Boundaries & Lot Price
Clark County, Washington
March 1997

Change Attitude, Create Regional Renaissance
By Alexander Garvin, St. Louis Business Journal
April 6 1997

Striving for Affordability, Balance & Choice
Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Portland
June 1997

Preserving the American Dream, The Facts About Suburban Communities & Housing Choice
Dr. Steven F. Hayward
September 1996

Keep Local Control, Avoid Growth Limits
Don Boehmer, St. Louis Post-Dispatch
June 1 1997

Sprawl Is Not a Threat
Don Boehmer, St. Louis Post-Dispatch
March 28 1999

Economic Reasons to Choose Suburbs
David Fielder, St Louis Post-Dispatch
March 28 1999

Suburban Legends: Why 'Smart Growth' Is Not So Smart
Prof. Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Sellinger School of Business & Management Loyola College in Maryland: Published by Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University Contemporary Issues Series 97
November 1999

Can-Do Unions: Competition Brings Out the 
Best in Government Workers

Stephen Goldsmith, Mayor of Indianapolis, Policy Review Magazine
March/April 1998

Taking Private Land for Private Interests: 
The Agenda & Policies of the American Farmland Trust

James D. Riggle & Jonathon Tolman, Environmental Studies Program, Competitive Enterprise Institute
July 1998

The President's New Sprawl Initiative:
A Program in Search of a Problem

Wendell Cox, Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies
July 1998

Ten Transit Myths
Randal O'Toole, Policy Study No. 245, Reason Foundation

Daily Jams Don't Keep Commuters From Cars
Scott Bowles, USA Today
April 14 1999

The Case for Suburban Development
Prof. Peter Gordon & Prof. Harry Richardson
March 1996

Smart Growth: A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing?
Frank R. Moretti, The Road Information Program
March 1999

Al Gore Has a New Worry
George F. Will, Newsweek Magazine
February 15 1999

Critiquing Sprawl's Critics
Prof. Peter Gordon, & Prof. Harry Richardson, Published by The Cato Institute, Policy Analysis No. 365
January 24 2000

The Virtues of Suburban Sprawl
Witold Rybczynski, Prof. of Architecture, University of Pennsylvania, printed in the Wall Street Journal
May 21 1999

Can America's Cities Exist Without the Suburbs?
Witold Rybczynski, printed in the Wall Street Journal
1999

Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?
Prof. Peter Gordon, & Prof. Harry Richardson, Journal of the American Planning Association
Winter 1997

Myths & Facts About Growth Management
Prof. Richard Morrill & Prof. David C. Hodge, Dept. of Geography, University of Washington, Seattle Washington
January 1991

Fun Things to Do with Planners: 
Comprehensive Statewide Land Use Planning

Jon A. Chandler, Portland Or., Land Development Magazine
Fall 1996

Squeezed Out: No Swing Set, No Sandbox, 
No Space for the American Dream

John A. Charles, Policy Perspective No. 1014 Cascade Policy Institute
February 2000

When Growth Gets Limited, So Does Housing
Hays El Nasser, USA Today
May 2 1999

Researcher: Sprawl Doesn't Hurt Cities
Hays El Nasser, USA Today
February 15 2000

Some Realities About Sprawl & Urban Decline
Anthony Downs, The Brooking Institution, Housing Policy Debate, Fannie Mae Foundation, Vol. 10 Issue 4
1999

Urban Sprawl & Liberal Gall
Thomas Sowell, nationally known economist and syndicated columnist
July 1999

Congressional Sprawl Study Fails to Find Culprit
Hays El Nasser, USA Today
May 2 1999

Community Development: 
Extent of Federal Influence on 'Urban Sprawl' Is Unclear

U.S. General Accounting Office, Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO/RCED-99-87
April 1999

NAHB Response to Sierra Club Report of Cost of Sprawl
Robert Mitchell, President of NAHB
April 13 2000

Since When is Sprawl the Enemy of Farmers?
Bill Harris, Indialantic Fl. letter to USA Today
August 18 1999

The Vanishing Farmland Myth & the Smart Growth Agenda
Samuel R. Staley, Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Brief No. 12
January 2000

Urban Growth Boundaries & Housing Affordability: 
Lessons from Portland

Samuel R. Staley & Gerald C.S. Mildner, Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Brief No. 11
October 1999

Seeking Refuge from Urban American Behind Gates
Roger K. Lewis, Prof. of Architecture, University of Maryland
October 2 1995

Controlling Growth
Editorial, The Indianapolis Star
April 9 1999

St. Charles Doesn't Deserve Bad Press
Dr. Terry Jones, St. Louis Journalism Review
June 2000

Toolkits for Addressing Issues in Local Communities
The Partnership for Quality Growth
2000

L.A.- The Geography of Home, Not Some Annex of Hell
D.J. Waldie, City Official Lakewood Ca., The New York Times
2000

Census Expected to Show Rebound in Rural Growth
Debbie Howlett, USA Today
March 20 2000

The Price of Managing Growth
Samuel R. Staley & Gerald C.S. Mildner, Urban Land Magazine
February 2000

Suburbs Today Not 'American Beauty' Vanilla
Samuel G. Freedman, USA Today
March 29 2000

Beware of New Federal Land Use Statistics
Dr. Steven Hayward, Pacific Research Institute
April 2000

Smart Growth: Building Better Places to Live, Work & Play
National Association of Home Builders
Spring 2000

Economist Feels that 'Smart Growth' is a Dumb Idea
David Nicklaus, St Louis Post-Dispatch
November 17 1999

The Sprawling America: In Defense of the Dynamic City
Sam Staley, Ph.D., Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Brief No.251
May 1999

Transit Myths Destroying American Mobility
George Passantino, Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Brief No.244
May 1999

A Sense of Community: Worth the Effort
Gil Stuenkel, Opinion Shaper Column, St. Charles Journal
October 6 1999

Laws of the Landscape: 
How Policies Shape Cities in Europe & America

Pietrov Nivola, Brookings Institution Fellow
1999

Cityscape: Who Planned This Mess?
Harold Henderson, Chicago Reader
March 12 1993

The Dark Side of Growth Control: 
Some Lessons Learned from Oregon

John A. Charles, Environmental Policy Director, Cascade Policy Institute, printed by Goldwater Institute, Arizone Analysis
May 1998

Cities Rely on Regional Cooperation to Survive
Terence Damuel, St Louis Post-Dispatch
June 13 1997

Barriers Won't Help Growth
Patrick S. Sullivan, commentary, St. Louis Post-Dispatch
March 15 1998

Pardon My Sprawl, But It's My Choice
Karen Diekamp Hitchcock, Opinion Shaper Column, St. Charles Journal
November 5 1997

Peirce Report Prescribes Wrong Medicine for St. Louis
Senator Steve Ehlmann, R.-St. Charles, St Louis Post-Dispatch commentary
July 20 1997

Urban Sprawl or Urban Choice
John Sonderegger, St. Louis Post-Dispatch
October 26 1997

Can Sprawl Be Good?
Wayne Lemmon, editor, Planning Commissioners Journal & Real Estate Economist with Maiden, Haase, & Smith, Washington DC. Member of the land use study committee for Inter Country Connector, Montgomery County, MD.

The Truth About America's Forests
National Association of Home Builders
1995


Planning and Economics Experts

 Drs. Peter Gordon and Harry Richardson

Professors of Planning and Economics, School of Urban Planning and Development and the Department of Economics, University of Southern California.  213-740-1467.  Long-time researchers, writers and lecturers who have advocated that free-market approaches are the best way to achieve economic prosperity.  They wrote an extensive 1997 study printed in the Journal of the American Planning Association which indicated that America is in no danger of running out of farmland.  They write that the role of government planners should be to “help the market to work, rather than attempt to strangle it.”  They also authored a 2000 study titled Critiquing Sprawl’s Critics which states, “The argument that urban sprawl gives rise to excessively costly infrastructure, excessive transportation costs and environmental damage is wrong.  The facts point directly in the opposite direction.”

Dr. Richard Peiser
Former Director of the Lusk Center for Real Estate Development, School of Urban Planning and Development, University of Southern California.  He is the Michael D. Spear Professor of Real Estate Development in the Urban Planning and Design Department in the Harvard University Graduate School of Design (617-495-9558).  He is an advocate of “the right to sprawl”—saying it is the free market way to a successful living environment.  He lectured in 1998 in St. Louis, saying that three-acre minimum zoning like what is found in most of Wildwood, MO, is “immoral.”  He believes poor land use (like government mandating large homes sites only) is bad and that trying to stop the market from geographically shifting to where it wants to is also very wrong.

Dr. Alexander Garvin
On the Yale University faculty since 1967, Planning Commissioner for New York City, frequent lecturer and author of recent book titled The American City: What Works, What Doesn’t.  203-432-2288 or 203-432-4771.  He lectured in St Louis in the spring of 1997, and wrote follow-up for St. Louis Business Journal.  He argues that growth management controls such as “urban growth boundaries” are inappropriate and that there are more productive ways to revitalize inner urban areas.

Dr. Michael L. Walden
Professor in the Graduate Program in Economics, North Carolina State University and an adjunct scholar at the John Locke Foundation.  919-515-4671.  He has performed an economic study on residential growth finding that it often “pays its own way” and he has written extensively about how growth management controls are inappropriate and are no substitute for preferred free market forces.  He wrote an article in Business Leader magazine in February, 1998, saying that “allowing a select group of individuals to control the region’s economic growth will stifle innovation, raise prices and disrupt the natural flow of competition.”

Mark Dotzour
Chief Economist, Real Estate Center, Texas A&M University. 
409-845-0369.  Heavily quoted in 1997 study by Texas A&M which school news release titled “Research Shows New Subdivisions Pay For Themselves.”  He has lectured on the topic.

Drs. Richard Morrill and David C. Hodge
Department of Geography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.  Co-authors of an excellent 1991 study titled “Myths and Facts About Growth Management” in which they find great fault with the Portland, OR, Urban Growth Boundaries concept.  Dr. Morrill is now semi-retired but still can be reached at the University, 206-543-5285.  Dr. Hodge is at 206-543-5340.

John Charles
Environmental Policy Director, Cascade Institute, Portland, OR. 
503-242-0900.  Charles knows the Portland experience very well.  He is the former Executive Director of the Oregon Environmental Council.  Basically, he has changed sides in the debate over land use.  A Portland newspaper account in 1997 described him as someone who “left the tree huggers for the free marketers.”  He has written extensively since leaving the Oregon Environmental Council on the value of the free market compared to excessive government control.  He says “sprawl” is a meaningless term.  He also has researched light rail transit and his analysis of Portland’s system indicates that it is too high cost for number of passengers moved.  In May 1998, he authored The Dark Side of Growth Controls:  Some Lessons from Oregon.

Samuel R. Staley, Ph.D. and Gerard C.S. Mildner, Ph.D.
Authors of “Urban-Growth Boundaries and Housing Affordability:  Lesson from Portland” October 1999.  Mr. Staley is Director of the Urban Futures Program (www.urbanfutures.org) at Reason Public Policy Institute and Mr. Mildner is an assistant professor in the School of Urban Studies and Planning at Portland State University, Portland OR.  Dr. Staley has authored numerous other related studies including The Sprawling of America:  In Defense of the Dynamic City, January 1999.

Anthony Downs
Well known national land planner and author, Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution, authored a study highlighted in February 2000, USA Today, which labeled the news “Researcher:  Sprawl Doesn’t Hurt Cities.”  Downs set out to find if movement to low density suburban growth was the reason for inner urban decline.  He says, to his surprise, he found that there was no link.  He is a seasoned lecturer who is both informative and entertaining.  www.brook.edu or 202-797-6000.

Jonathan Tolman
Environmental Policy Analyst, Competitive Enterprise Institute.  202-331-1010.  Co-author with James Riggle of George Mason University of 1998 study which indicates that America is in no danger of running out of farmland.  CEI generally advocates free market solutions.  Among his previous positions, he worked for the White House as an environmental analyst.

Wendell Cox
Wendell Cox Consultancy, Belleville, IL.  618-632-8507. Reseacher and lecturer with extensive background in transportation issues.  Frequent advocate for road and bridge infrastructure.  Cox also criticizes many light rail expenditures—especially in Los Angeles—as being too high for the number of passengers moved.  Cox uses data to make strong case that suburbanization actually has decreased urban transportation congestion.

James V. DeLong
Author of Myths of Light Rail Transit for the Reason Public Policy Institute.  May 1999.  DeLong provides arguments why light rail is not the answer to modern urban congestion.  He looks at speed, capacity, decongestion, cost-effectiveness, urban form, low income population, jobs and capital investment.  www.rppi.org.

James D. Riggle
On the faculty at George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. 
703-993-4626.  Riggle co-authored a 1998 study finding that America is not in any danger of running out of farmland.  A former Senior Policy Director of the American Farmland Trust, he knows first-hand of what he describes as AFT’s deceptive claims about loss of farmland.  AFT is the leading source for those such as the Sierra Club who make claims about the need to curb “sprawl” and save farmland.

Dr. Steven Hayward
Senior Fellow, Heritage Foundation.  703-299-9514 or 703-299-8368.  Dr. Hayward has written, lectured and debated frequently in national forums on the issue of “sprawl.”  One of his reports was released in November 1998, titled “Growth and Renewal in the St. Louis Metropolitan Area.”

George Will
Nationally known columnist, author of Al Gore Has a New Worry in Newsweek Magazine, February 15, 1999.  Subheading describes the article:  Smart Growth’ to cure ‘suburban sprawl’ is the newest rationale for government growth.  Will criticizes the notion that suburban development is bad and takes issue with arguments that strong growth management controls are needed.

Thomas Sowell
Nationally renowned African-American, conservative economist and columnist.  Author of syndicated column titled ‘Urban Sprawl’ and Liberal Gall, 1999, by Creators Syndicate, Inc.  In the article, Sowell attacks as myths much of the criticism directed at so-called “sprawl” and writes that critics of suburban growth usually are advocates for more and bigger federal government.

Witold Rybczynksi
Professor of Architecture, University of Pennsylvania, author who also wrote for The Wall Street Journal in May, 1999, article titled The Virtues of Suburban Sprawl.  Rybczynksi argues that most of suburbia has been planned and rather than demonizing the suburbs, efforts should focus on how to make better suburbs and better inner cities.

Jon A. Chandler
Attorney, Vice President of Dotton & Associates, Portland, OR.  Jon is a witty and experienced attorney and humorous speaker on the topic of land use and urban growth boundaries in the Portland area.  503-223-8983.  He is the author of various articles including Fun Things to Do with Planners:  Comprehensive Statewide Land Use Planning, Fall 1996, Land Development magazine.

Randal O’Tool
Senior economist with the Thoreau Institute, author of several books.  Book published 2001 titled The Vanishing Automobile and Other Urban Myths:  How Smart Growth Will Harm American Cities, The Thoreau Institute.  The book “shows that smart growth increases traffic congestion, air pollution and housing costs, and reduces urban open spaces available for families to enjoy.”

Pietro Nivola
Brookings Institution fellow, author of Laws of the Landscape:  How Policies Shape Cities in Europe and America, 1999.  Nivola does not think Americans should expect their cities to approach European cities in regard to densities and urban form.  He also does not buy some of the standard arguments against sprawl.  He has somewhat controversial solutions—including stronger gun control, eliminating highway trust fund and more.